User fees and beyond--the FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012.
نویسندگان
چکیده
n engl j med 367;14 nejm.org october 4, 2012 1277 legislators, and patient advocates. The driving force behind the legislation was the need to reauthorize statutorily defined user fees that pharmaceutical manufacturers (since 1992) and medical-device manufacturers (since 2002) have paid when they submitted applications to the FDA for the evaluation of new products. The bill sailed through a closely divided Congress for two main reasons. First, most policymakers understand that because of chronic underfunding of the FDA by the federal government, these fees have become essential components of the agency’s budget — particularly on the drug side, where they have amounted to more than $500 million annually in recent years (see graph). User fees have become required for the continued daily operation of the agency as it pursues its mission of protecting the public health. Second, the FDA and industry had reached agreement on important elements of the legislation and presented Congress with their plans to guide the law’s development. Apart from user fees, a major focus of FDASIA is streamlining the process of premarketing review of drugs and devices. For example, the legislation broadens the scope of the fast-track designation and the accelerated approval process for drugs for “serious or life-threatening” conditions. It requires the FDA to consider as clinical end points in the study of these drugs “epidemiological, pathophysiological, therapeutic, pharmacologic, or other evidence developed using biomarkers, for example, or other scientific methods or tools.” The FDA is also given the authority to designate a new drug candidate as a “breakthrough therapy” if “preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies [for serious or life-threatening conditions] on 1 or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development.” When a drug is classified as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA will work closely with its User Fees and Beyond — The FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012
منابع مشابه
FDA user fee law poised for passage in Congress but not without stirring up controversy.
T he fourth iteration of the 1992 law that allows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to levy user fees on drug companies contains several reforms that could create a major change in how the agency monitors the safety of new drugs after they enter the market. Lawmakers are using reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) to overhaul the agency's authorities and responsibili...
متن کاملA proposal for financing postmarketing drug safety studies by augmenting FDA user fees.
I propose to raise funds for postapproval studies of long-term drug safety by augmenting the existing "user-fee" system. Fees would be raised by an amount deemed optimal for revenue collection, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would direct the incremental funds to a combination of randomized controlled trials, epidemiological studies, and postmarketing surveillance. User-fee augm...
متن کاملCongress is likely to approve generic drug user fees: action should spur faster FDA approvals.
$824 billion in the last decade. The cost savings benefit is obvious, and some even claim that generic products can be safer than their brand-name counterparts. Edith A. Rosato, RPh, Chief Executive Officer at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, explains: “Generic drugs, by definition, are versions of brand-name drugs that have been available in the marketplace for many years. The longer a dr...
متن کاملPharmacy Groups Want to Change The FDA's REMS Authority: Battles Loom as Congress Aims to Pass a Major Bill by September 2012.
ify higher fees for drug companies; however, revamping REMS won’t be the only issue. Pharmacists are concerned about another FDAAA provision: the FDA’s creation of an active Sentinel adverse reaction alert system, meant to supplement its existing passive MedWatch system, which has been roundly criticized for its shortcomings. In fact, both Democrats and Republicans, often at the behest of speci...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The New England journal of medicine
دوره 367 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012